fbpx

Templeton.org is in English. Only a few pages are translated into other languages.

OK

Usted está viendo Templeton.org en español. Tenga en cuenta que solamente hemos traducido algunas páginas a su idioma. El resto permanecen en inglés.

OK

Você está vendo Templeton.org em Português. Apenas algumas páginas do site são traduzidas para o seu idioma. As páginas restantes são apenas em Inglês.

OK

أنت تشاهد Templeton.org باللغة العربية. تتم ترجمة بعض صفحات الموقع فقط إلى لغتك. الصفحات المتبقية هي باللغة الإنجليزية فقط.

OK
Skip to main content

Bridging gaps through an interfaith investigation into the problems and possibilities of randomness

Does God play dice with the universe? Although Einstein famously denounced the possibility, he was not making a theological claim. He was rather voicing his frustration with the apparent implications of quantum theory, which seemed to upend the notion of determinism in physics according to which knowing every detail about a system’s present state allows one to know what will happen to it in the future.

Many religious believers face a similar tension when confronted with true randomness in nature, whether at the quantum level, in the mutations that fuel natural selection, or in the contingent events that define every human life. “I think most religious believers in the past thought that God is in some way not the immediate cause of everything, but certainly the ultimate cause,” says Kelly James Clark, Senior Research Fellow at the Kaufman Interfaith Institute at Michigan’s Grand Valley State University. “When randomness enters the picture, then you have to figure out, as a religious believer, how that is possible.”

BEYOND “SCIENCE AND CHRISTIANITY”

For most of the past five decades, Clark says, the most prominent work on the compatibility or conflict between religion and science has been done in relation to the Christian traditions. “It’s been de facto science and Christianity,” he says. “There’s been a massive amount of work, and it’s really terrific, but it hasn’t really concerned science and religion broadly since it hasn’t been addressed science and Islam, or science and Hinduism, or science and Zoroastrianism, or science and Judaism.”

In an effort to begin filling at least some of that vacancy, Clark is leading a capacity-building project to create a larger circle of dialogue concerning science and the three Abrahamic faiths, Islam, Christianity and Judaism. Kelly has recruited a cohort of 24 young scholars, eight each from the three religious traditions. Their backgrounds range from philosophy to quantum physics, but most of them had not done prior work on the science-religion intersection. To offer guidance the junior cohort, ten senior scholars, including physicists, biologists, philosophers, theologians and historians — have also joined the project. Clark’s colleague Jeff Koperski, a philosopher based at Saginaw Valley State University, helps handle the project’s daunting multinational logistics.

THE IMPORTANCE OF PRESENCE

The three-year project is designed with annual weeklong gatherings of the participants to compare notes, learn from one another, and plan future projects. The first of these gatherings was held in the summer of 2017 at the Fetzer Institute in Kalamazoo, Mich. The other two conferences will be held further afield, in 2018 in the historic Christian city of Orhid, Macedonia and in 2019 in Amman, Jordan.

At the Kalamazoo conference, the project’s senior scholars gave academic lectures on probability, quantum randomness, fine-tuning in cosmology, chance in biological practice, and the concepts of freedom, responsibility and evil. The entire team also enjoyed time with 2017 Templeton Prize winner Alvin Plantinga, whose 2011 book Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism is a key source text for the project.

Clark notes that as important as the intellectual exchange is the participants’ in-person presence: “If we’re going to do multi-faith, cross-disciplinary projects where we don’t know each other’s language, and we don’t know each other’s assumptions, and we don’t know each other’s traditions, it’s important that we spend time together,” he says.

“People gave great talks, the questions were good and thorough, and the project got off to a really good start, but in addition many bridges were built that can only be built in person.”

STILL CURIOUS?

Learn more about the project here.

Watch brief video reflections on Science and Religion from project participants.

Read Kelly James Clark’s book Religion and the Sciences of Origins.